Dr Jane meets with UK physician and scientist, Dr. Philippe Van Welbergen, one of the original doctors to find damage to the blood from the bioweapon shots in his patients, when standard diagnostic tests failed to show any abnormalities. Now Dr. Philippe reports on very new findings that the UNjabbed are full of graphene and self assembling nanoparticles in their blood….the manifestation of shedding from those who took the dangerous, bioweapon injections for the fake Covid 19 scam. And in the last segment, organic farmer, herbologist, and raw food expert, Raven Ae joins Dr. Jane for the Natural Health Series focusing on reducing inflammation in the body. This is the Dr. Jane Ruby Show and you’re about to enter Truth In Medicine.
Aussie doctor, Dr. William Bay, hijacks the Australian Medical Association meeting (where Fauci was making a guest appearance), pleading with his colleagues to join the right side of science, otherwise putting them all on notice.
Most of them fled like flies.
Medical episodes caused by Covid mRNA vaxx are suspected of causing more and more road accidents in the Far North.
Over the past week there have been an unprecedented number of accidents, many with sole occupants of cars hitting trees along the roadside.
A man is fighting for life in the Townsville University Hospital after crashing is car into a tree near Palm Cove on Saturday night
Earlier two people were taken to hospital after a five car pile-up east of Mareeba on the Kennedy Highway.
The Forensic Crash Unit has asked for dash cam footage or any other information about the crashes.
A Cairns medical unit source questioned the high number of accidents saying the increase coincided with the 12 month long Covid vaxx program.
CDC ACIP July 19 Meeting: Myocarditis Risk Update, Novavax Safety + More
Good morning. CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] has upcoming vacancies on the ACIP — six positions including consumer rep. The usual CYA discussion regarding COIs [certificate of insurance] was performed.
The positions start next July but applications have been extended but must be completed soon.
Now all the members name themselves and state they have no conflicts of interest.
Matt Daley has no conflicts except for consulting for CDC; isn’t that a conflict?
Note that you cannot see any faces, and some of the names are cut off the screen, which is deliberate, as they show … instead of the end of the last name. Now they have stopped showing the names on the screen and only show a photo of a CDC building
Most of the names are said quickly and not very clearly so I cannot list them correctly.
It is interesting that so many members from affiliated organizations are asked to attend — perhaps 30 — they don’t vote.
Jeff Duchin represents IDSA, from Kings County, where children as young as 12 were vaccinated without parental permission.
Kings County, Washington state.
Matthew Daley speaks now. They can’t find his slides.
That $100 million audiovisual center isn’t working well.
Now we get started with a slide of diagnosed cases over time in the U.S. with 89 M cases and over 1M deaths reported. Depending on the data set, between 10 and 14% of adults have not received any COVID-19 vaccines.
Fleming-Dutra of CDC is on, waiting for her slides to appear. We see an image of a telephone. What is CDC afraid of? There has not been a face on the screen yet.
89 M cases reported — but elsewhere CDC admits only about 1 in 4 cases are reported.
The obligatory race slide shows slightly increased disproportion of cases in Hispanics.
COVID hospitalizations are up — but if you look at the LA County info from two important docs, you would have learned that only 10% of admissions with COVID are there due to COVID. 90% are there for something else. LA/Keck hospital has not seen a COVID pneumonia in several months!!
Yet deaths are flat.
She presents the faked data from CDC in which vaccinated COVID cases are reduced by restricting reports, while the unvaccinated are tested more and are sought as COVID cases.
Peter McCullough on Planet Lockdown has just pointed out how data such as she is presenting are clearly fake as they fly in the face of the preauthorization data and the data from Israel, the UK, Germany, Denmark and South Africa. All these countries show the vaccinated are more likely to be hospitalized and die.
Now the claim is made that minority ethnic groups, who apparently suffer more from COVID, are proportionately non-vaccinated.
20% of those in poverty are unvaccinated.
Rural people are considerably less vaccinated.
In conclusion, we should continue to fear COVID, and we should shed crocodile tears over the unvaccinated minorities and other unvaccinated Americans.
Sara Oliver jumps in about boosters — we decided not to discuss them today. 35% of elderly got 2 boosters and 70% of elders got one booster.
Asked how vaccine coverage aligns with rates of disease, hospitalization and death — surprise! we don’t have that slide!
Wonder why CDC chose not to compare vaccine status with outcomes — most likely because they could be questioned about the veracity of their data?
Note that the CDC-NYT charts on vaccination status versus hospitalizations and deaths lag by a couple of months … presumably, it takes time to massage.
Everything else on the NYT-CDC page is up to date by the day, except the only charts on vaccination status vs outcome.
Tom Shimabukuro will discuss myocarditis. Nothing new, presented last month. So why do it again?
Myocarditis is usually thought due to viruses, but only actually found in about 38% of cases. Can be autoimmune.
Dr. Tom claims that mRNA myocarditis is much less severe and clinically relevant compared to viral myocarditis. But that is only 30 some percent of myocarditis. How does it compare to other forms of myocarditis?
In people 18 and up 1321 myocarditis cases verified to meet CDC case definition.
He claims the rate of myocarditis after 1st booster is low, but data from overseas suggests it is at least as high as after the 2nd dose.
70% of cases were in males. Going through all this mumbo jumbo, CDC is still unable to get rid of the 75.9x expected rate in 16 to 17-year-old males during the first week after dose two.
38.9x higher rate in 18 to 24-year-old males.
Docs and patients were surveyed at least 90 days post diagnoses. 66.6% were fully recovered. Over 15% not fully recovered but improved. There is no category for “got worse.”
These cases are from VAERS. Why not check on hospitalized patients in another one of CDC’s databases? It was not clear whether the data came from docs or patients to claim that most were fully recovered.
Vaccine Safety Datalink does a tricky comparison comparing 2 vaccinated groups at different time periods after vaccination.
Looking at the first week post-dose, the VSD find elevated rates about a third of what the VAERS found.
This is probably due to failures in the analysis identified in a paper by Katie Sharff et al. It turned out that ICD-10 codes were omitted that also signify myocarditis, and the time period when info was sought failed to include all cases due to delayed reporting. When Sharff corrected these mistakes, the myocarditis rate approximately doubled. I should note she studied the identical database: Kaiser.
It is of interest that these data conflict with those from 4 Nordic countries, which showed that if a Moderna vaccine was used after a Pfizer vaccine, myocarditis rates doubled from just getting 2 Moderna doses. It also obscures that Moderna causes a lot more myocarditis in Europe than allegedly in the U.S., compared to Pfizer.
“The available evidence” suggests most people fully recover from myocarditis “within 3-8 months.”
He is asked whether the males are disproportionate due to higher levels of athletic activity?
Should we recommend no strenuous physical activity after, say, one week after a shot? Shimabukuro says we don’t have that data. Right. Why would you present useful data?
Matt Daley says we have not collected it, but anecdotally the symptoms occur at rest. But that isn’t the question. The issue is whether asymptomatic myocarditis causes arrhythmias while undergoing strenuous exercise. CDC does not want to address this question, so they waffle around the issue instead. Daley guesses it would not change outcomes if we made this recommendation.
The confidence intervals are massive because they don’t have enough people in the study because CDC did not use its other databases to more comprehensively study myocarditis. For example, CDC has access to the DMSS database with at least 1.5 million mostly young males. But those data are not being used. Why?
In about 5 European countries, young males are not allowed to get the Moderna vaccine. Now Tom admits that in one subanalysis he found the same thing, but an FDA study did not find it…the general trend is that there is a modest increased risk for Moderna, but not consistently found (he does not say it is not consistent because of the CDC and FDA fudging the data)
Matt Oster is brought in to make the spurious claim that myocarditis is more common after COVID disease, which has been shot down in at least one recent paper. ESPECIALLY false for Omicron variants.
Dr. Tom is asked about additional surveillance. He is somewhat vague, though some record reviews will be ongoing. They will look for it after Novavax starts being used. I guess he knows it is about to be rolled out.
How they do the rapid cycle analysis (weekly or less reviews) will depend on how many doses of Novavax get used.
In other words, he is making no promises of how much study will be ongoing. I think CDC would prefer to say they are done with myocarditis, as their flawed stats could bite them.
9-minute break. Now Philip Dubovsky, CMO of Novavax speaks. His screen is not being shared.
“Saponin-based adjuvants are used in other vaccines” — but NONE in the U.S.
50 mcg Matrix-M adjuvant plus 5 mcg antigen per dose, 2 dose series. He claims his vaccine showed >90% efficacy. 30 K people used in a crossover study so all eventually got vaccine. 90% protection from mild mod severe disease.
100% protection against severe illness — all cases in vaccinated were mild. The studies were done primarily before the delta variant came in — in other words, more than a year ago.
No data on omicron and very little on delta.
Most of the 4 studies were done overseas. He says 50,000 subjects and 20K were placeboes — how does he identify the crossover subjects who served as both placebo and subject?
What was in the placebo?
There are high rates of malaise and immediate reactions in the placebo groups, only a tad lower than in the vaxxed group. Were the placebo subjects given Matrix M?
They claim there were 3 myocarditis cases, one in the placebo.
One myocarditis case had severe COVID after dose one — he was not counted as vaccinated because the speaker said earlier there were no severe cases in the vaccinated. There was a person in their 20s dx’d with a heart attack and there are a few other cases. Ah, now we are up to 17 myo/pericarditis cases! in 50,000 subject — or 1 in 3,000!!!!!
No cases of anaphylaxis or TTS. They had one GBS case.
Pregnancy was an exclusion criterion but a few people got pregnant. 147 pregnancies occurred. 41 live births so far. 25 miscarriages and 13 abortions, 1 ectopic.
11 unknown pregnancies. I don’t believe these data, since most of the subjects were dosed before 12 months ago — so virtually all pregnancies should now be completed. 41 live births vs 25 miscarriages show far too many miscarriages — there should have been no more than about 10. Furthermore, hiding the rest of the pregnancy data does not bode well for safety in pregnancy.
They claim a second dose makes the vaccine work against variant BA.5
The speaker clearly tries to obscure the understanding of this QS-21 adjuvant, whose name was recently changed, presumably to confuse the unwary.
What was the placebo? Normal saline he says.
When did the GBS case occur? Dr. Kim will answer that…and we did see another case recently. 1st case was in her sixties with progressive neuro deficits developing OVER A YEAR but he claims the patient delayed reporting and the progressive nature of her disabilities was confirmed. She got IVIG and improved. They always say improved. How improved? Is she in a nursing home?
Initial symptoms occurred within the first few weeks after the first dose.
Studies conducted before Omicron. All we have are antibodies with Omicron.
Two-thirds of cases were alpha.
We had 100% seroconversion — but there is no correlate of protection so these don’t mean anything.
It is 11:57 am and we are asked about data on the immunocompromised. Novavax has limited data. We had some HIV-positive patients who had slightly lower titers after vaccination.
Second dose doubled their titers. Note that the prior slide used a log scale while this study used a linear scale, to make it appear the doubleing of titers is meaningful when it probably isn’t.
3% of U.S. population is immunocompromised. What about the others? We are planning future studies once we can market this.
How do you define mild, moderate and severe cases? Vaxxed was defined as 7 days after dose 2. U Washington had to do the PCR test. Bill Gates owns a chunk of U Washington, so now we are seeing that Bill is a secret partner here.
Even someone who died from COVID in the trial was DROPPED because he did not have a PCR done at U Washington!! What a great way to drop troublesome endpoints!
They did not prevent 90% of asymptomatic cases, maybe 70% if I understood correctly.
No fetal cells used in this vaccine.
The GBS case improved after steroids, so apparently, she did not get IVIG.
Re pregnancy: “we started 2 years ago and the women are still under surveillance now.” So why did you lose half the pregnancies, Dr. Dubovsky?
Someone else points out the high rate of miscarriages. The data are only through March 15 — in other words, Novavax does not want to tell us the results obtained over the past 4 months!
Out of 147 pregnancies, they are missing a huge amount of data in women they claimed to be following for at least 2 years.
Asked about waning, they provide titers — which is meaningless and looks like titers always do. There is no admission regarding waning of actual efficacy. They used 60 days of observation, then did the crossover, ending the placebo — just as FDA allowed Pfizer and Moderna to do, as apparently everyone knew that after 60 months efficacy was going to drop rapidly. 60 days was the magic number at which efficacy was to be determined, then the placebos were to be vaccinated so longer-term data could never be collected.
Big deal, one study went for 3 months. We are not impressed.
Who were the 50 people who died during the study? Can we learn what happened to them? How many people stopped working? How many had normal activities interrupted?
Dr. Kim of Novavax provides the usual “system-organ” grouping to hide the actual diagnoses. This was also done iwth Pfizer and Moderna and is a newish method for obscuring adverse event data. It stinks. It lumps myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, arrhythmias, heart failure together as cardiac. Novavax generally says there was no pattern in the serious adverse events and in the deaths. Now we learn follow-up was only about 6 months for safety.
Novavax shows a slide that shows the placebo group had roughly as many cardiac arrests and heart attacks as the vaccinated.
What can you say about omicron protection? WE don’t have those studies yet. They show us estimates of efficacy. I have no idea how these estimates (by U Washington) were made. Was this the IHME, a fully supported subsidiary unit of U Washing created by Bill Gates?
Please tell us about prevention of death and hospitalization. Protection was 100%. But when PCR was done at local hospitals, those patients were dropped. In Mexico there were 6 hospitalizations and 1 death in Mexico in placebo group. Studies done in UK and South Africa are not available yet — even though they were completed before Delta — this is so unacceptable.
Now for public comments.
A green circle appears on the screen. We have not yet seen a face.
Grace Lee welcomes them and says the commenters entered a lottery. I did not bother applying for this one.
Brian Dressen, whose wife is severely injured, speaks first. He notes neuro and myocarditis problems. Australian data confirm this. COVID vaccines are much more dangerous than older vaccines. Serious AEs are common, not rare. CDC is not performing the required analysis of safety signals. His wife was dropped after being injured after dose 1. Clinical trials are not appropriately analyzing the data. CDC is responsible to do this but it is not happening. How can we say they are safe under these circumstances?
A second person has had very serious AEs from her COVID vaccine.
A thrid person is from a 501c3 military polling organization. (Does that sound right?). She claims that 2/3 of service members said they wanted choice regarding which vaccine they selected … and therefore the implication is more soldiers will take a COVID shot if Novavax is offered.
I’d love to know who donates to her 501c3.
4th speaker is from vaccine talk. This seems like an astroturf organization that allows pharma to launder donations used for propaganda.
She claims some of the unvaxxed would be willing to take Novavax. I guess that is true if propaganda presented to them is effective.
Lindsey Burmeister is vaccine injured as a result of the Moderna vaccine and has a community of similarly injured in Washington state. USG agencies have suppressed their stories and won’t fund research into their injuries. Canada, Thailand and Australia have compensated the vaccine injured but in the US, there are over 5,600 applications to CICP for vaccine injuries, yet not a single one has received a dime in benefits. Why does ACIP stay silent? We need help and an acknowledgment of our injuries by CDC in order for them to be addressed. .
Martha Nolan speaks for ‘Healthy Women” and its evidence-based information. We encourage the use of Novavax. Providers need more options to reach the unvaxxed. Especially those poor black and Latinx who we stay up all night worrying about.
Why don’t these pharma shills beg for early treatment for the immunocompromised and everyone else at risk of a serious illness? The fact that theyhave NEVER asked for this at any of the dozen or so meetings I have attended is the PROOF they care nothing about black, Latinx or anyone else. They only care about spouting pharma lies upon which their organizations depend for funding.
There seems to be a delay again.
Restarting with Dr. Twentyman on the “evidence to recommendations framework.”
She provides an intro aimed at 10-year-olds. Now she lays out the policy question: should Novavax be given under EUA to 18-year-olds and over?
CDC is guided by evidence of course. Now we must endure lots of gobbledygook on many secondary issues regarding vaccination.
COVID-19 continues to pose a significant threat in the US she says, incorrectly.
She uses the faked CDC slide claiming hospitalizations are higher in the unvaxxed.
By 3.5 times. Only if you omit most of the cases in the vaxed. It is clear that deaths have been flat for over 2 months. But she claims the unvaxed are 6x more likely to die from COVID.
Luckily most Americans have figured out the vaccines are a scam and almost no one is getting vaxxed anymore.
She doesn’t explain why about 15% of those who received a first dose failed to go back to complete the two-dose series.
Now for the so-called benefits and harms, using an “explicit evidence-based record”
Data cut-off was 10 months ago — September 2021 and most cases occurred before Delta (last summer-fall’s variant)
All the data come straight from the Novavax company, which I think means that CDC did not go over it to look for potential data problems.
If I understood, you needed to vaccinate over 100 people to prevent one case during the follow-up period, or perhaps for one year.
Suddenly the 50,000 cases drops to 25,000 — did they count the cross-over twice? How can you do that with those vaccinated first? There was a 2:1 vax: placebo ratio. So where are the rest of the subjects?
1% in vax and in placebo group had a serious adverse event. Hmmm. Did they put the more ill subjects into the placebo arm?
She repeats earlier info and repeats her own info. We understand that for reasons best known to FDA, CDC and Novavax, they have no omicron info, despite omicron being in the US since last November (9 months). For FDA’s VRBPAC meeting, Novavax promised that their vaccine worked for omicron because they had identified areas of the spike sequence that were conserved in the newer variants. Strangely, that argument has not been made at this CDC meeting. Was it a lie?
Let me be clearer: Novavax claimed that they had created a spike trimer of different sequence than the mRNAs that should and did work against all the variants — but their data was based on antibodies.
They claimed this was efficacy data but it was not, it was immunobridging data.
The fact they have not made that argument with only 1.5 hours to go suggests that although they may have pulled the wool over the eyes of the VRBPAC, they are not trying to pull it off again.
Now she claims the disease is the big problem wrt myocarditis. I have screenshot her claim to study it later.
How could the VSD reveal fewer myocarditis cases within one-week post vaccination than VAERS? VSD is supposed to be active surveillance and VAERS passive surveillance? This goes against all knowledge about surveilling for adverse events.
Now we see data from Novavax that indicates up to 1 in 7,000 doses or second doses get myocarditis!
High efficacy for alpha variant. Efficacy for current variants unknown. Can’t compare this with mRNA vaccines.
The ANTICIPATED EFFECTS are expected to be large. benefit exceeds risk — which is an easy judgment since neither benefit nor risk has been established.
RAND surveyed 541 unvaxxed and concluded that 16% said they would probably or definitely get an adjuvanted vaccine. What were they told about the adjuvant or the myocarditis?
Only about 10% of unvaxxed adults wanted a traditional type COVID vaccine (which does not exist).
How much taxpayer money gets spent to survey Americans to try and figure out how to get more people vaccinated?
77% of unvaxxed adults said you take any kind of vaccine and put it where the sun don’t shine.
Are the benefits to the target population (the unvaxxed) large? No, said the workgroup, there is uncertainty here
85% of people trust their own doc while 54% trust govt officials regarding vaccine information
CDC will continue to do everything it can to increase vaccine acceptability and accessibility.
Vials are stored in the fridge, and must be used up with 10 doses within 6 hours of opening the vial! Looks like the plan was to throw most of it away since the USG has already bought it for us. The company is actually safer the fewer people who receive it.
599 million doses of COVID vaxes have been administered in the US, and the USG has already bought 3.2 M doses of Novavax.
ACIP is being signaled that we have already bought it, so you better vote unanimously in favor of using it.
Now my favorite subject: Equity, aka how to coerce minorities to be poisoned by these vaccines at least equally with what CDC terms white non-Hispanic people.
I will say that this ACIP meeting did not say “pregnant people” but instead said “pregnant women” — indicating perhaps that focus groups have indicated that the new BS regarding pronouns etc and pretending that genders are fluid may be going away, or has never ‘stuck’ in this group of M.Ds.
CDC has more to learn about the barriers to vaccination. So they need to keep doing more surveys, instead of offering safer vaccines.
Now they go into the demographics of the unvaxxed. CDC has bribed 500 partners to improve vaccine equity — you are invited to visit the Partnering for Vaccine Efficacy website.
It was determined that Novavax would not improve health equity.
This process of balancing risks and benefits is so bogus — there is nothing quantitative about it, no one voted on anything, the assessments are pulled out of the air, and this dumb speaker then makes the incredible claim that COVID vaccination is the best way to PROTECT AGAINST cardiac risks.
I neglected to mention that the Nordic study of myocarditis (only Pfizer and Moderna vaccines) should have been mentioned as a comparison to some of the data provided, but wasn’t.
OOh, now there is an admission about the monkeypox vaccines causing myocarditis, and so there could be considerably more risk of myocarditis if it is given at the same time as or around the same time as a COVID vaccine.
But don’t delay getting that monkeypox vaccine.
The only contraindications to Novavax is having had an allergic reaction to its components before. That’s it.
Few people would have a contraindication since CDC has narrowed them to almost nothing. A history of myocarditis does not serve as a contraindication. CDC is up to its old tricks of trying to federalize the granting of exemptions, based on nothing zip nada — just CDC’s opinion that everyone can be vaccinated.
One wonders whether if CDC’s liability as a “government program planner had not been waived by the PREP Act, whether CDC would be so bold.”
Myocarditis is not even a precaution! Just wait till it’s over, then get your shot, dummy!
Waiting 8 weeks between the 2 doses might lower myocarditis, as is alleged by Canadian scientists. Waiting 8 weeks would even optimize vaccine effectiveness. So then why doesn’t the label say wait 8 weeks between doses?
That would be too logical for these bureaucratic weasel-worders.
It took many dozens of people to provide this pap. Now for questions.
Hmmm, no expiration date on the vials! How was that approved? You have to look them up on a website? I guess the reason is so FDA can keep extending the expiration, which it already did for mRNA vaccines. But the speaker is not admitting that. But I can prove it.
No reason is given, the speaker is just weaseling around the issue.
It is a “strictly logistic reason”. Duh. We all know the date is not being stamped on the vials because FDA wants the opportunity to change them at will, without the public being aware.
The FDA speaker cannot address this. Does it have to do with the EUA? She will check the regulations.
What a clown show.
Asking about mixing and matching the doses — here is where the Nordic study is critical, but studiously ignored. If you give the Moderna later expect the myocarditis risk to double or triple — very dangerous to mix and match.
CDC will provide “upcoming clinical guidance” for the mixing of doses.
Dr. Sanchez says there is a lot of myocarditis. We are looking for the pathogenesis (cause). But it could be the spike protein. [BINGO!]. I guess this comment was verboten because now Novavax jumps in to say they take safety extremely seriously and COVID causes a risk to the heart and the vaccine protects against those cardiac risks, even in young males. [What a lie.]
Dr. Sanchez asks if V-safe will be used for Novavax safety surveillance? Shimabukuro says yes.
Matt Daley starts to talk about mixing and matching, saying he hoped we would not get into a situation … but someone did not like where this is going, so the sound got cut off.
I wonder which of the higher-ups decides when to cut the mikes. Amanda Cohn? The ACIP Sec Melinda Wharton?
Still no sound. I guess they want it to look like some dreadful failure of their 100 million dollar studio.
Now we see a picture of 5 empty chairs, presumably in the CDC studio. I have never seen this photo before.
Now we have music.
And we cut back into an ongoing meeting. Tom asks for the question again.
We never hear Daley. Sanchez asks about mixing doses. Sara Oliver is here claiming there is a power issue. Audio is back up.
Sanchez has been cut off. Hall comes in to discuss mixing errors but of course, she does not mention how mixing could lead to additional adverse effects.
Can you put up a slide? We need to reset, need a 3-minute break.
Now for the vote to accept Novavax as a primary series.
Here they acknowledge the vaccine is adjuvanted, whereas elsewhere they try to pretend it is an old-fashioned vaccine.
Someone is sensible! She notes only 10% of the 10% of the unvaxxed (1%) might use it. There is no rush. Why can’t the darn expiration date be put onto the vial?
We are losing credibility. I think the expiration should be there before the US public gets this vaccine.
Fryhofer admits that FDA kept extending the expiration dates unpredictably. The moving expiration date is not new but it is confusing.
Grace Lee cuts off the discussion after someone pops in to make a motion to vote.
Someone didn’t want any more expiration comments.
Unanimous agreement as usual.
Suddenly we see some faces. But the name labels are too small for me to read in most cases.
Thanks to you all and to all a good night. But Dr. Long wants to know about optimized boosters for the fall. We are six months past our second booster and we see rates of disease going up in our age group. I guess she is one member who believes the Kool-Aid. Grace Lee shuts her off since we don’t have an answer today. Please let’s do adjourn.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
Cairns health authorities are being overwhelmed with alleged Covid infections leaving hospitals and health services with acute staff shortages and those remaining suffering from extreme exhaustion.
Two patients who had flu symptoms told Cairns News they had tests done which revealed they had Influenza ‘A’ in spite of health authorities claiming they had Covid.
What the State Labor Corporation is neglecting to say is that the Covid mRNA vaxxes are coming home to roost as more and more patients are re-infected from dangerous and useless jabs and staff being infected by virus shedding from patients and getting their own mandated deadly booster shots.
Ambulance services are at breaking point reporting more and more heart problems transporting new patients every day.
Cairns Base hospital recently recorded its largest ever daily admission when 320 patients were ‘ramped’ in numerous ambulances at the emergency department door.
Patients injured by mRNA jabs filled the corridors and waiting rooms but health authorities refuse to state how many of these patients had the vaxx.
Hospital sources told Cairns News back in May that 80 per cent of new admissions and deaths were vaxx related.
The stupidity and duplicity of the Australian Medical Association continues as union representatives refuse to admit the vaxx is the problem.
Cairns doctor and Together Union representative Dr Sandy Donald said the removal of state government mandates around masks and other measures which helped to slow the spread of Covid would impact the sector.
Now the discredited and incapable Health Minister Yvette D’Ath has waded in with more diatribe previously claiming she could not understand why there was such an unprecedented high increase in heart and other health problems.
The number of people being treated in hospital for Covid-19 is almost as high as it was during the state’s first peak earlier this year, with the third wave still at least a month away from peaking.
It comes as more than 6000 cases were recorded in Queensland in Tuesday.
Minister D’Ath said there were almost 1000 patients in hospital with the virus, almost matching the total reached in the first Omicron peak.
“We have 928 hospital beds across our public and private system of Covid and influenza cases,” she said.
“This means that we have almost the same number of beds being taken up at our peak of the first wave of Omicron.”
More than 2300 health staff are furloughed because of Covid-19.
Ms D’Ath said the most hospital and health services have moved to tier 3 meaning elective surgeries were being delayed across the state.
Queensland still has the lowest take-up rate for the third shot, with an alleged 63.7 per cent of the eligible population now covered.
Letter to the Editor
Pfizer documents confirm HORRIFYING goal of relentless COVID-19 jab campaign.
Could curbing population growth really come down to creating mass hysteria in response to a highly survivable flu-like illness, culminating in a global mass vaccination program that has billions of people – including pregnant women – exposing themselves to a new gene-based therapy with both known and unknown long-term health risks?
According to an analysis of Pfizer data by The Daily Exposé, yes, it could come down to that. The data again puts into focus the concerning trends of these COVID shots on pregnancy, fertility, and more.
Suppressing data, changing policy on a whim – world governments exhibit shady motives regarding COVID shot, especially for pregnant women
Remember when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tried to prevent the public from having access to Pfizer’s COVID shot “safety” data for 75 years – even though the administration had no issue giving emergency use authorization (EUA) to the mRNA injection after spending just 100 days to review clinical trial data?
Remember when the United Kingdom government in December 2020 advised AGAINST the mRNA COVID jabs during pregnancy and breastfeeding and said that women should avoid getting pregnant until at least two months after their most recent dose of the jab – but then suddenly changed their stance, saying that administration of the vax in pregnancy “should only be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any potential risks for mother and (sic) fetus?” (Our response to this: how on EARTH could anyone know whether the potential benefits of a brand new drug technology would outweigh “any potential risks” if there are still UNKNOWN RISKS and absolutely NO long-term safety data?)
Incredibly, the UK government has the disgusting gall to say today on the updated version of their website that “[t]here is no known risk associated with giving non-live vaccines during pregnancy.” This is patently misleading and FALSE – given that ALL vaxxes, whether “non-live” or not, come with potential known AND unknown risk of adverse effects, up to and including death (just read the package inserts).
Remember when Pfizer acknowledged that of the 270 known cases of pregnant women who received a COVID shot as of 28th February 2021, fully 238 were lost to follow-up, and of the remaining cases in which outcomes were known, 97% of them resulted in fetal death?
Remember when President Biden said on live television that the decision to receive (or not receive) medical treatment such as a vax was no longer a matter of personal freedom of choice for Americans?
When you take these and other issues into context, things just don’t add up. Why – other than (or in addition to) having their hands in Big Pharma’s coffers – are world governments so quickly changing their tune on COVID shots and pregnancy? Could it really be some nefarious motive – to slow population growth in the future by inducing fertility problems now?
Pfizer, government promises COVID shots are not shown to harm pregnancy, fertility – but this is NOT the same thing as proving that they are SAFE
Government officials from the UK, US, and other countries frequently reference Pfizer clinical data, which allegedly support the claim that “animal studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects” regarding reproductive toxicity, pregnancy, and breastfeeding.
Yet one of the primary animal studies referenced by these governments paints a very different picture.
According to The Daily Exposé, the study – published in August 2021 in Reproductive Toxicology and titled “Lack of effects on female fertility and prenatal and postnatal offspring development in rats with BNT162b2, an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine” – included 42 female Wistar Han rats, half of whom were given the Pfizer COVID jab.
The study actually showed that vaxxed rats had double the rate of “pre-implantation loss” than rats in the control group (pre-implantation loss refers to a fertilized egg failing to implant into the uterine wall).
Vaxxed pregnant rats were also more likely to give birth to rat pups with a type of birth defect known as supernumerary ribs.
Let’s remember, of course, that rats – especially rats explicitly bred for animal research – are a LOT different, physically and physiologically, from humans. So, even putting aside the important animal rights concerns for a moment, we should seriously question the ethics of encouraging (or in many cases coercing or forcing) pregnant women to inject themselves with a new gene-based drug simply because inadequate amounts of animal research show “no evidence” of harm – which, by the way, is NOT the same thing as “proof” that these shots are safe.
Readers will also remember that we have data showing that the COVID shot material accumulates in organs throughout the body, including the ovaries, and can affect women’s menstrual cycles. So just what are the long-term implications of this for human fertility? The answer is that we simply do not know – so shame on any medical “expert,” government official, or Big Pharma shill who tries to gaslight women into going against their instincts and “consenting” to this gene-based therapy.
At the demand of the medical mafia the Queensland Labor Corporation soon will try to force a dangerous face mask mandate on Queensland sheeples.
The Chief Health Officer claims to act under Queensland Labor Legislation which in effect is corporate policy and has no effect or authority on natural persons not members of the corporation.
Their policy applies only to public servants and members of political parties. Cairns News has specific medical advice that mask wearing is nearly as dangerous to health as the mRNA vaxx.
On 17 June 2022, Queensland’s declared public health emergency for COVID-19 was extended to 11.59pm on Thursday 22 September 2022.
The Public Health (Further Extension of Declared Public Health Emergency—COVID-19) Regulation (No. 2) 2022 was made by Queensland’s Governor in Council, and extends all active Public Health Directions issued by the state’s Chief Health Officer.
This means active Public Health Directions with an end date of 24 June 2022 have been automatically extended until 11.59pm on Thursday 22 September 2022. Directions will be progressively updated to reference the new date of 22 September 2022.
These doctors say wear a mask at your own risk and fill your lungs with dangerous fibres released by the mask. The elephant in the room is that masks do not prevent any pathogen from being exhaled or entering the airway.
CDC ACIP Meeting Day 2, June 18, 2022 — Dr. Liz Mumper
I’ll be live-blogging today.
Surprised that so many committee members report no conflicts. Many academic physicians in particular are funded to do drug trials. Perhaps CHD can take a deep dive.
“Real work effectiveness” really took a back seat to immunobridging in yesterday’s conversation. Remember the numbers in trials were small and COVID infections relatively rare.
I am concerned that in setting like pharmacies, medical histories and potential reasons to delay or not give these vaccines will not be explored.
The assumption seems to be that these vaccines will be given. The majority of states had already ordered them prior to this week’s meetings.
Perhaps one good study going forward is to look a the prevalence of SIDS, blood clotting disorders, and sudden neurologic deterioration in babies in vaxxing and non-vaxxing states.
I get invitations to these educational sessions. In my experience, data from VAERS concerning adverse events is rarely mentioned.
Seems like a lot of work on the logistics of distributing vaccines, less attention to what to do about children who have bad reactions.
Florida could be an excellent control group if their rollout was delayed, but this sounds like measures are in place to ensure that Florida children will get access.
Pfizer documents show that in the first 6 weeks of the roll-out, 4 people died the day of the shot. CHD predicts babies will die – the question is – how many?
Parents reported that V Safe used a drop-down menu of choices for what to report. They found it difficult to report problems that did not fit the expectations.
Ensuring equity is the mantra because all committee members do not see a downside to COVID jabs. I would love to know what they think when they look at VAERS.
For people who are vaccine-hesitant because of concerns about the need (risk: benefit) or safety, CDC see it as a messaging issue. They still say “safe & effective” without nuance.
One problem with multidose vials is that if the providers do not shake the liquids appropriately, some doses may contain more or less of certain contents.
We say this problem when thimerosal was in lots of vaccines. Since mercury is a heavy metal, it tended to sink to the bottom of the vial.
The decision seems to be to allow wasting doses but not to spend the extra money to do single-dose vials. Sells more vaccine, saves production costs.
Government decision-makers during COVID have not listened to front-line primary care physician perspectives nearly enough.
Remember that in the Moderna trial there were no severe cases in either the placebo or vaccinated group. 74.2% of kids were already naturally immune to COVID in Feb 2022 – likely over 90% immune now. Do not understand their urgency.
I hope Dr. Oliver mentions the April 6 FDA meeting in which they concluded that there are no valid correlates of protection, meaning we should not use proxies like immunobridging to predict clinical outcomes.
Evolutionary biologists warned that if a vaccine that did not stop transmission was released during a pandemic, the virus would mutate and the pandemic would be prolonged. Here we are.
Death rate in age considered today 0.9 per 100,000. So an important calculation is the number of serious adverse events per 100,000 from the jab.
I will need to read this paper carefully. Usually, natural infection leads to a broad T cell immune response. Vaccines target the humoral arm of the immune system, meaning specific antibodies.
Primary endpoints were surrogate markers.
Comparing immune responses of children to adults. A few differences: children have different norms for blood counts, they have a prominent thymus, and usually have excellent innate immune systems.
What if instead of a jab we worked on supporting the innate immune system, which would allow children to do better with a variety of viral illnesses?
Evidence was low Dr. Oliver acknowledges. Serious limitations in the data.
Confidence intervals are a big deal!!!
High reactogenicity can mean more than a fever. We are concerned about adverse neurologic effects and clotting abnormalities and effects on reproduction.
Dr. Oliver presented industry data slides very quickly, making it hard to analyze well. However, a few thoughts follow:
They unblinded six months after the second dose. There goes the control group for long-term adverse events.
Much of the evidence presented was “very low certainty” due to issues like small numbers of subjects and large confidence intervals. 2 dose efficacy was 15-32%.
Serious adverse events 1-1.5% – will add up to a lot if all kids are jabbed
HOld on – prior slide showed that no data could make a determination about hospitalizations, MIS-C or asymptomatic infection. Do not understand how she is calculating these numbers needed to vax.
So for the number needed to vax, we need to see how many adverse events occur per 3000 jabs (picking a mid-range from Dr. Oliver’s estimate).
I do not understand her take on myocarditis. First, we do not know that myocarditis is related to dose of vax. In fact, it seems that certain people have what will probably turn out to be a genetic predisposition.
So my analysis of the totality of the evidence — with conclusion opposite to Dr. Oliver.
Many vaccine-hesitant parents are former Vaxxers, whose children had bad reactions.
The occupation most vaccine-hesitant = Ph.Ds.
I wish they would stop doing surveys about vaccine-hesitant parents to figure out how to change their minds and listen to the concerns from vaccine safety advocacy groups and VAERS data, etc.
Dr. Oliver presented a slide about serious adverse events. Because of the short follow-up and a low number of participants, did she not say the evidence was “very low certainty”? Could this be a factor in vaccine hesitancy?
There is a subset of pediatricians who will not embrace these vaccines. Those who have done independent research on their practice outcomes often find the highly vaccinated have more neurodevelopmental problems, multiple ear infections, allergies and asthma.
So docs have to order minimum of 100 doses!
Several papers show higher rates of myocarditis in Moderna compared to Pfizer. So could easier administration issues lead to more adverse events? We shall see.
Are COVID jabs the answer for Native Americans? I would think other factors like lack of early treatment, access to primary care, poverty and diseases of despair might be implicated as causative.
COVID vax being rushed is NOT a myth!! How can Dr. Oliver say that when her own data is rated a low certainty evidence due to small numbers and short follow-up. This myth assertion is a sound bite, not a fact.
She just showed a full slide for less than five seconds — allowing me to read the first two lines only.
Sorry, did she identify who was in these work groups?
Cases of COVID in children leads them to conclude vaccines are the only intervention. CHD promotes early treatment when needed, and abhors how much effective, cheap early treatments have been suppressed and denigrated.
Lots of work has gone into developing messaging/marketing for these jabs.
Remember they did not have more than a few immunocompromised patients in their study.
“Small risk” of myocarditis. Risk is 1:2700 per studies in Hong Kong and Kaiser. The ACIP attitude that this is a “kinder, gentler” type of myocarditis is not borne out by the data. When echocardiograms are done, we actually find evidence of subclinical myocarditis, even when no symptoms.
By the way, how will your 6-month-old baby tell you her heart hurts?
So they did not get the label right, but we should still have confidence in Pfizer? Remember the billions they have paid in the past for fraud.
Remember when we were told we could get any combo of manufacturers available to us?
Dr. Oliver horrifies me with this attitude of giving simultaneously with other vaccines. They do not have the data to recommend this. And there is data that multiple vaccines per CDC schedule lead to high levels of aluminum per body weight. Some ingredients in COVID vax have not been revealed. How can we be reassured to do this experiment on babies and toddlers when the public does not have all ingredients?
And the CDC “knows” that there is no problem with MMR and autism.
Vaccine rates did decrease during COVID — so did rates of SIDS. See Mark Blaxill’s analysis.
Parents in my practice tell me that the CDC, FDA and government responses to COVID have made them more vaccine-hesitant. They have lost confidence in the credibility of these agencies.
I am not as worried about the transient side effects CDC always emphasizes. I am worried about rare, severe, life-altering reactions, which ACIP admitted they would not detect with the power of these studies.
Remember that lipid nanoparticles were designed to cross the blood-brain barrier. So this is a new frontier for effects on the brain. Febrile seizures may be the least of our worries. New data is emerging about prion illness. Does ACIP consider this in their deliberations?
My answer to her questions is NO.
This entire team sees the data differently than I do, apparently. For the sake of our babies, I hope I am wrong.
Yet data shows negative efficacy in children, meaning they are more likely to get infected. Data at odds to what is shown here.
so, children 5-21 infected pre-Omicron. We are deciding on babies and toddlers.
Good to question the surge reasons.
The deaths per 100,000 in this age is 0.9 per their data.
Globally, highly vaccinated countries have more serious COVID infections and hospitalizations. Examples include Israel and Portugal.
In adults, low Vitamin D correlates with higher mortality. Has CDC looked at this in kids?
Children have more robust innate immune systems than adults.
After COVID vax, there is a period of 1-2 weeks in which the immune system is suppressed.
Kids are not little adults. We should not draw conclusions based on extrapolating their data. Doc just said they do not have great data in kids, but they are using that point as a major reason to deploy the shot to babies and toddlers.
Surprised that they have not mentioned concerns about lipid nanoparticles or spike proteins. They also do not mention what I call the “Goldilocks phenomenon” How do they know how many spike proteins babies will make, when they will turn off production, and how long they last in the body. Adult studies suggest spike lasts at least 60 days.
Doc mentions anti-nucleocapsid antibodies last at least 2 years.
Acknowledges their goal is to prevent hospitalizations and deaths. Expects infections to continue.
Dr Brooks notes that infant hospitalizations increased during omicrom. We do not know from this slide what the vax status of the other ages who did not increase.
She is saying we should not use breakthrough infections because these vaccines were not designed to be sterilizing or stop transmission.
PEG — polyethylene glycol — has now been found in the breastmilk of COVID jabbed mothers. What implications does that have for their babies? Will PEG in shots given to babies cause allergies?
Lipid nanoparticles are widely distributed in the body. They preferentially go to the ovaries. Baby girls are born with all the eggs they will ever have. What will lipid nanoparticles do to their eggs and ovarian function?
There have been myriad adverse events to this shot — more than for all other vaccines over the past 30 years. Does this committee look carefully at VAERS data?
Pfizer documents show that 270 women accidentally became pregnant during the study. For 234, the outcome is unknown. For the 36 who were followed, 28 lost their babies. Could a shot given directly to babies be harmful?
Acetaminophen depletes glutathione by 30%. Glutathione is the main gateway to detoxification and is the cell’s main anti-oxidant. So if there is bad stuff in this shot, I do not want to hamper the baby’s ability to handle it. I am also worried about the impact on mitochondria, which make me loath to dampen the body’s response to oxidative stress. Acetaminophen use in pregnancy is associated with increased risk of neurodev delays including autism. I wish the committee know this.
So, we told you so. Evolutionary biologists warned about pressuring the virus to mutate with a non-sterilizing vaccine released during a new pandemic.
She mentions preventing MIS-C. Dr. Oliver’s slide acknowledges they did not have data to show that it would decrease MIS-C.
Keep an eye out as more Pfizer documents are forced to be revealed. They knew about a lot of adverse events. They lost a lot of pregnant patients to follow-up. There was a lot of fetal loss in the first trimester from early on.
So they only did an analysis on subsets — not on the whole group. Certainty in the results is impaired.
Why isn’t anyone asking about VAERS and the Pfizer reveals?
This doc does not want to promise decreases in hospitalizations or deaths since the data does not support this. Let’s control expectations.
She reviews the slides about how relatively poor the data is, but data will evolve and we need to stay on top of it. No data for MIS-C prevention, hospitalizations or mild illness.
Moderna release a trove of documents the Friday before FDA/ACIP review week. Pfizer released on Monday — one day before the FDA meetings and five days before this meeting. I do not think we should expect that all these experts have reviewed these documents.
Immunobridging is suggestive, but remember it ignores actual health outcomes. They only looked at about 10% of the vax’d group’s blood for these antibody studies. They did not look at immunobridging in placebo kids. Wouldn’t we want this information to compare?
Under harms discussion, no one seems worried about myocarditis. Twenty-six studies now have been published showing high myocarditis risk. They did not find it here but agreed the study was underpowered for rare side effects.
These docs like to compare to other vaccines as if they were all just fine.
Infants have very few ACE receptors, so less likely COVID can do as much harm as in adults.
Some amount of exposure to viruses is a normal part of infancy and toddlerhood.
Scandinavian countries analyzed the data from Moderna and decided not to use.
Let us not rush to trust safety data from the manufacturers!
Post authorization safety tracking includes VAERS, in which U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to June 3, 2022, for 6-month-olds to 5-year-olds show: 1,658 adverse events, including 63 cases rated as serious and 3 reported deaths.
Thirteen report blood clotting disorders in the same time/age period.
They are proceeding for a recommendation of approval based on a guess that three doses will correct negative efficacy. Pfizer has a serious problem: Its two-dose data reflected the reality since the Israeli and Barnstable County data came out: the confidence interval for their estimate of the number of cases prevented by three doses of their vaccine points, if anything, to negative efficacy (-369.1 to 99.6). The problem is not just that the result is based on a small number of data points.
Moderna ran only PCR tests if patients in the vaccinated group had two symptoms. In other words, they made up their own clinical designation of “COVID-19.” Under CDC’s case definition (which is also not correct), Moderna’s data show that in kids 2 to 5, “vaccine efficacy” was 36.8% but under Moderna’s new definition, 46.4%. Moderna also used antigen tests, making any measure of efficacy incomparable to other studies.
Extrapolating to make conclusions and then recommendations.
Theresa in the chat asked who I am. Board-certified pediatrician with 42 years experience. Former Medical Director Autism Research Institute. Medical Advisor for Children’s Health Defense. Vaccine safety advocate.
I can imagine a lawyer asking docs why they did not follow the instructions? Agree the billions of dollars pharma got could pay for new labels.
Pharma does not have liability. Less motivation to get the label right? Now it shifts the burden to the primary care doc to do enough extra CDC-sponsored education to get the correction to do something different from what the label says? Come on! What if the doc does not make the extra effort to devote more time to listening to the CDC?
If CDC sticks to the language “safe and effective” without disclosing the potential for serious side effects, it is not truly informed consent.
So if the EUA goes away will the shots stop?
When children are injured from vaccines, the AAP needs to provide support and education to pediatricians on how to take care of them.
It has been hard to listen to this discussion. So much data – directly from Pfizer and Moderna – seems not to have been considered.
We had concerns they were not safe or effective but they listened to us and decided this anyway.
I am signing off now.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission.
from The Expose
The aviation industry is ignoring risks introduced via its own Covid policies. It has introduced widespread medical risk to its personnel. In a newly released video, ‘Global Aviation: Fit to Fly?’, a panel of accomplished pilots and deeply experienced doctors discuss the medical advice of the Australian Civil Aviation Safety Authority (“CASA”) and discuss its serious shortcomings.
The panel includes:
- Lt. Col. Pete Chambers D.O., a heavily decorated US Special Forces Flight Surgeon who himself suffered vaccine injury.
- Lt. Col. Theresa Long MD MPH, Aerospace Medical Specialist who testified to Sen. Ron Johnson regarding her experiences with vaccine-injured military patients.
- Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD, President and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation.
- Pilots Alan Dana (Training Captain Jetstar), Graham Hood (Captain, QANTAS), Glen Waters (Captain, Virgin Australia)
In Global Aviation Advocacy Coalition’s (“GAA Coalition”) video, the panel listen to the behind closed doors medical advice that the Principal Medical Officer of CASA, Dr. Kate Manderson, gave to the pilots of one of Australia’s airlines. The panel critique her advice in the context of their knowledge and experience treating vaccine-injured pilots and other patients.
What Dr. Manderson tells pilots and the context of her advice is shocking. The ramifications are far-reaching for pilots and passengers alike. Australia’s pilots have all crossed a line after they were forced into vaccination mandates, under fear for their jobs and livelihoods. This shows you how CASA unequivocally supported that mandate even in the face of known fatal risks to pilots from Covid “vaccines.”
The biggest irony of this is that Australian aviators who did exactly what good aviators should do – think critically, assess risk and make safe decisions – were the ones whom the airlines, regulator and government punished and sacked. These aviators worked out that new risks were being introduced into flying that simply should never have been allowed, and so they resisted. Now, their assessments are being proven right as pilot vaccine injury increases. They are taking their fight to the courts and they are not alone.
The panel provides recommendations for a way forwards that would:
- deal with the issues they have all seen;
- care for those affected; and
- restore flight safety.
Covid political decisions damaged the aviation industry, along with innumerable others. The industry made a choice to go along with the Covid narrative and became a willing participant in the political decisions that were supposed to lead to the way out. In doing so, aviation abandoned rational thought and care for aviation rules, regulations and the people in the industry.
Covid injections are brand new and inadequately tested technology that aviation embraced instead of treating with caution. This was a fundamental mistake because vaccination is an irreversible act. Now, we are coming to learn of the negative effects Covid mRNA/DNA injections have on the human body. As time goes on, we are learning just how little testing and scrutiny the injections have been subjected to and the picture gets worse. There remains no long-term data about Covid injections’ effects on human health. The number of recipients is not a substitute or analogue for the passage of time.
By aviation’s own rules, Covid injections should never have been allowed into aviation until sufficient evidence about them had been acquired. Now, they are widespread. In territories that have mandated their use, practically 100% of aviation workers including pilots and cabin crew have taken them and many have suffered various side effects and adverse events. Literally, no one did any testing of Covid injections in the aviation environment.